Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 5 Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for associations between last 6-month overdose prevention service access and prescribed safer supply receipt (N = 491)

From: Factors associated with obtaining prescribed safer supply among people accessing harm reduction services: findings from a cross-sectional survey

 

Unadjusted OR

Adjusted OR

L6M overdose prevention service access

No

Reference

Reference

Yes

1.99 (1.20–3.31)

2.08 (1.20–3.60)

Gender

Cis man

Reference

Reference

Cis woman

0.84(0.49–1.41)

0.75(0.42–1.32)

Transgender and/or gender diverse

3.01(0.70–13.00)

4.40(0.92–20.98)

Age

 < 30 years

Reference

Reference

30–39 years

0.45 (0.22–0.93)

0.55 (0.25–1.21)

40–49 years

0.57 (0.28–1.14)

0.58 (0.27–1.26)

 ≥ 50 years

0.23 (0.10–0.49)

0.25 (0.11–0.58)

Unknown

0.36 (0.07–1.73)

0.19 (0.01–1.88)

Urbanicity

Small population centre

Reference

Reference

Medium population centre

0.63 (0.37–1.10)

0.68 (0.37–1.25)

Large urban population centre

0.33 (0.18–0.63)

0.34 (0.16–0.70)

  1. Bolding reflects statistical significance, where confidence intervals do not cross 1
  2. Adjusted models are adjusted for age, sex, urbanicity; OPS unadjusted model = 443, N = 48 (9.8%) missing on OPS variable; N = 8 missing on gender, Adjusted model run on N = 435
Back to article page

Harm Reduction Journal

ISSN: 1477-7517