Guiding Question 1: How did information about xylazine adulteration spread? |
Theme 1: Clients initially identified a tranquilizer-like adulterant that heightened sedation and withdrawal symptoms and caused wounds. |
Theme 2: SSP medical providers identified xylazine by treating new medical cases and through diverse information-sharing networks including professional societies and news sources. • Medical cases: wounds in non-injection sites, tissue necrosis, challenges alleviating withdrawal symptoms • Information sharing networks: professional societies, conferences, harm reduction partners, media coverage |
Theme 3: SSP frontline staff and clients needed additional educational resources about xylazine and its potential side effects. • Desired educational materials: staff training, client-facing pamphlets |
Guiding Question 2: How did SSP clients respond to seeing xylazine in the drug supply? |
Theme 4: Clients began altering their drug consumption routes, reducing drug use, and relying on their peers’ experiences with the drug supply to protect themselves from xylazine. • Transitioning from injecting to smoking, anal administration • Using the same seller, ‘street science’ testing methods, sharing safe supplies |
Theme 5: Xylazine’s emergence led some individuals to prefer xylazine-adulterated opioids and to increase their drug use. • Potentially prolonged, intense high, conflicting perceptions of xylazine’s half-life |
Theme 6: Seemingly protective behaviors like increasing the use of stimulants, using alone, and conducting ‘human testing’ placed clients in harm’s way. • Mixing drugs, using alone, ‘human testing’ for potency |