Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 4: References for the frequently cited facilitators and obstacles to HR adoption

From: Facilitators of and obstacles to practitioners’ adoption of harm reduction in cannabis use: a scoping review

 

Facilitators

Obstacles

Theme 1: stakeholders’ characteristics

Education

Training in SUD or HR

Lack of training in SUD or HR

 

[64,65,66, 70, 76]

[32, 64, 66, 70, 71, 75, 77,78,79,80]

 

High education level

Low education level

 

[64, 67, 73]

[67, 73]

Sociodemographic characteristics

Young stakeholder age

Older stakeholder age

 

[73, 74, 81]

 

Beliefs and perceptions

Considering that the zero-tolerance approach may have a reverse effect

Maintaining personal beliefs stigmatizing drug use

 

[63, 82]

[75, 81]

Theme 2: clients’ characteristics

Factors related to SUD

SUD severity: moderate

SUD severity: severe

 

[74, 76, 81, 83,84,85,86]

[74, 76, 81, 83,84,85,86,87]

Therapy considerations

HR used as intermediate treatment goal

HR used as final treatment goal

 

[74, 76, 81, 83,84,85,86]

[74, 76, 81, 83, 84, 86]

Medical and/or psychiatric status

Comorbidity with a psychiatric disorder

 
 

[32, 64]

[71, 74, 75, 84]

Theme 3: factors related to HR

HR principles

HR focuses on clients’ needs and objectives

 
 

[32, 66, 69, 76, 79, 83, 87, 89]

 
 

HR creates a nonjudgmental framework

 
 

[32, 77, 80, 89]

 

HR efficacy and/or misconceptions

HR efficacy

Misconceptions related to HR

 

Perceptions of HR benefits and efficacy

Uncertainties about HR efficacy and/or dangerousness

 

[32, 64, 72, 91]

[32, 64, 74, 76, 78, 80]

 

HR seen as fostering clients’ engagement

Misunderstanding HR practices (e.g., lack of knowledge about treatment application)

 

[32, 64, 66, 75, 79, 88, 90, 91]

[32, 64, 71, 78, 79, 89]

External and other factors

Laws that favor HR adoption

Illegality of cannabis among a specific clientele

 

[66, 69, 82]

[74, 79, 82]

Theme 4: factors related to the workplace

General factors

Management leadership and support

Workplace philosophies that run counter to HR

 

[66, 71, 85, 91]

[32, 71, 74, 88]