Table 1 Addresses approached and response rates
From: Door-to-door overdose harm reduction: an Illinois case study
| Â | Doors Approached | Able to talk to someone | Interested in receiving training and materials | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type | Count | Yes | No | Response Rate % | Yes | No | Other* | % interested |
Single family residence | 919 | 412 | 507 | 45% | 300 | 111 | 1 | 73% |
Multi-unit residence | 433 | 219 | 214 | 51% | 137 | 75 | 7 | 63% |
Business/ commercial | 238 | 226 | 12 | 95% | 198 | 17 | 11 | 88% |
Public building/ Not for profit (church, library, social service, school, etc.) | 44 | 39 | 5 | 89% | 32 | 3 | 4 | 82% |
Other | 6 | 5 | 1 | 83% | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
Overall | 1640 | 901 | 739 | 55% | 672 | 206 | 22 | 75% |